We would honestly love to hear your feedback, if you have an idea for a new rating criteria, let us know! post in the feedback forum, or send us an email to. easily compare and evaluate similar products based on identical criteria. you can identify that a product is rated highly for pigmentation without reading a lot of text. there isn’t a right answer, only your opinion.Īn added benefit to the scales is quickly seeing how a product might perform. Sheer might be a desired quality for you, while vibrant might be desired for someone else. pigmentation ranges from sheer to vibrant. we just want to encourage and provide great reviews without that particular barrier to entry.Īs an example, one rating criteria for eyeshadows is pigmentation. don’t let us discourage you from waxing poetic if you are so inclined, some people are gifted writers and should share if they want to. Without the need for long-form written text, everyone saves time. this format gives reviewers a way to provide an in-depth review of the same specific aspects of a product, allowing you zero in on the criteria that are most important to you. to achieve this, we provide a ratings scale for distinct criteria, alongside traditional written comments. we believe product reviews should provide you with detailed information, let the writer quickly and easily share their thoughts, and be a fun experience for all.

Feedback for the crease-resistant category the current five is a sign that considering the question 'how crease-resistance is this product?' lean strongly towards stays put.Īt blushgarden, we think differently about reading and writing beauty product reviews. It is a permanent eyeshadow that retails. On the pigmentation category the current rating of four suggests users & critics in response to the 'how pigmented is this product?' mainly favor vibrant. Here are our dupes for MAC Mo Money Mo Problems, which is a very warm-toned, medium green with a matte finish. Considering feedback for the colour category a rating of four indicates replies to 'does this product shift, or is it true to the pan/box/tube?' somewhat suggest true to colour. Looking at review rankings for the application category the rating of four suggests evaluating 'how did this product apply?' usually indicate even. Reviewing the easy to apply category an average of four suggests reviewers when asked 'how easy to apply did you find this product?' usually favor applies itself. Prefer prose? A snappy summary of reviews

Mac mo money mo problems eyeshadow